When Nixon’s secret tapes of his White House conversations were released under duress as part of the machinations of Watergate, the phrase, “expletive deleted” from the typwritten transcripts entered the language. Nixon’s chat was not always of an elevated nature.
There is a blog on the NYTimes Opinionator page about a contest to redesign (yet again) the suburbs, this time of Long Island. What struck me most about this post was the comments: they are vehement, often violent, and I have never seen so many editorial deletions of inappropriate comments. Apparently, feelings about urban design run pretty high. And I am a frequent reader of climate-change blogs, where emotions are not exactly, shall we say, cool.
One line of thought was that the entire idea was a crock. The suburbs are hell. They should be razed completely. Tax auto use to the skies and force those jerks to take mass transit.
Another was that NYC life has become impossible for middle-class people with families, so why do you hate us so much?
Plans of all sorts abound, from utopian to totalitarian. Everyone has the solution. Everyone should be happy to live in the suburbs that I design.
Confusion over the very nature of terms is fundamental. Manhattan is an American anomaly. Many local suburbs are as dense as cities elsewhere in the USA. Most people who live in American cities live in regions that would at least look suburban to New Yorkers.
Sprawl is evil. Suburbs are evil. Cities are virtuous. People in the suburbs live soulless, isolated lives. As if you can’t be terribly lonely and bored in the midst of a crowd in Bryant Park.
For another post on the topic of urbanist-ideological ranting, visit here: Facing the Reality of Sprawl.