May 27, 2014
A silly visual pun, but is it any more silly than the tortured “originalist” intepretations of the US Constitution by the likes of Justice Scalia when it comes to the right to “bear arms?” Joe Nocera points out today in his column, that new scholarship makes clear, if it ever was not clear, that The Framers meant for citizens to have the right to form armed militias – they didn’t have, and didn’t want a standing army in those days. Now, we have quite an army; an entire military-industrial complex. The one that the army guy, Eisenhower, warned us about.
Is Scalia listening? It really has nothing to do with hunters, homicidal maniacs, criminals, and other gun lovers, that many today feel should be regulated.
The justice likes to claim that he bases his opinions only on what The Framers said, or what they “meant,” but of course, he decides what they meant. And his originalism is remarkably flexible, always hewing to the latest right-wing conservative line.
Now, none of this is too surprising, but what did bring me up a bit short was Nocera’s comment that this position by the Republican establishment is relatively recent, c. 1980. It coincides with the Reagonzo Revolution, the ascendance within the Republican party of the angry, somewhat bigoted men, white men. Thanks again, Ronnie.
September 17, 2013
In the news today:
An argument over the teachings of the philosopher Immanuel Kant between two men standing in line for beer at an outdoor festival in southern Russia ended when one man shot the other in the head with gun loaded with rubber bullets, the state RIA news agency reported on Monday, citing the police. Though the wound was not critical, the attacker faces up to a decade in prison if convicted on assault charges.
BTW, the images of the bandit are from the final sequence (or the first, in some releases) of The Great Train Robbery (1904), a seminal work in the history of film. It’s pretty darn good, and you can watch it on Youtube.
December 15, 2012
Not the model the Sandy Hook shooter used, but hey, are we going to outlaw such a cute innovation?
October 24, 2012
In Montana, a 40-year old man was intoxicated, and angry about the affair going on between his wife and his neighbor. He walked over to the neighbor’s house: the neighbor knew he was coming. He had time to go inside and retrieve his gun. Then he shot the man three times. No charges will be filed because of the state law allowing a person to use lethal force against anyone on your property who you feel might be threatening you. The angry man was unarmed.
So, a man is dead, four kids have no father, because a guy was afraid of getting punched in the nose, and didn’t want to suffer the humiliation of just staying inside behind a locked door.
As one commenter on the story said of our screwed-up thinking about the value of life, “The life of an eight week old fetus is sacred, but the life of a 40-year old father is not worth protecting.”
October 5, 2012
This woman’s son was shot by police when they pulled him over after he allegedly cut them off on a NYC highway. Everyone in the car, including an off-duty police officer, was unarmed. The NYPD has offered no explanation for why the officer fired the fatal bullet.
This sort of thing seems to happen a lot in NYC, and the victims are usually black or Hispanic.
The two police trucks forced Mr. Polanco to stop after one truck went in front of the Honda while the second truck maneuvered behind. After the car stopped, along a median of the busy highway, two officers approached the car, a sergeant at the driver’s side and the detective at the passenger’s side where the windows were open, the police said.
Ms. Deferrari later told the police that she had heard the officers order those inside the car to show their hands. In an interview, she said that Mr. Polanco had no time to comply and that, in that instant, the detective, Hassan Hamdy, 39, fired the shot. Ms. Deferrari said she believed the shooting was the result of a case of police road rage.
No weapons were found inside Mr. Polanco’s car, the police said.
Complete newspaper article here. Does shooting someone like this count as police ‘brutality’ I wonder..?
March 22, 2012
A kid walks through a neighborhood with some candy, and a guy with a gun reports him in a 911 call. Then he follows the kid, despite being advised not to by the 911 staff. Then he shoots the kid to death. Sounds like murder to me, maybe first degree. That is, premeditated. How far in advance do you have to plan it for it to be more than manslaughter?
No charges have been brought since the great state of Florida condones such behavior as justifiable self-defense. After all, Zimmerman felt threatened. Umm…so do I.
May 5, 2010
Loved this show as a kid. Certainly, this is one of the most memorable sequences in popular TV.